The weighty matter of healthcare.

Obesityby Dr. James Stewart, Family Physician, North Bay.

With the constant hand-wringing and doom and gloom healthcare spending news, there is one scenario that is not getting near the attention it deserves. Obesity. It is approaching epidemic proportions and, left unaddressed, is all but guaranteed to negatively impact our healthcare budgets and further burden our healthcare system. Certainly, the topic of obesity does make into various news stories, often in health or lifestyle sections of the news outlets. And ask anyone with a weight problem if they want to lose weight, they will be undoubtedly tell you they do. However, it’s not easy, especially as people get older. As the boomer generation ages, obesity is an epidemic waiting to happen. It should be no surprise that the promise of helping people lose weight is a multi-billion dollar industry.

The motive for wishing to lose weight is often appearance. However, the motive for me as a family doctor to encourage patients not to just lose weight but avoid gaining it, is a health issue. Obesity can lead to heart disease, type 2 diabetes, strokes and hypertension.The associated healthcare costs for treating these illnesses is not insignificant. This, like so many health issues in our society, is often, preventable. The adage, “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” in this case is an understatement.

However, according to research conducted by the Sports Matters Group (“a national organization dedicated to advancing the role of sports in public policy”…their words) only 1% of national healthcare budgets is spent on prevention programs.

There have been discussions and efforts made to introduce what has been labelled a ‘fat tax”…tax on products that are known to contribute to weight gain. Fast food and soft drinks are prime examples. Obviously, the corporations in these industries have a lot to lose if that manner of taxation is actually introduced. Understandably, they fight it. So what we have, in my opinion, is an industry that profits from products that can create health problems while we have passed on the healthcare costs of treating these problems to taxpayers.

This is something that warrants action. We are familiar with what is referred to as ‘sin tax’ (taxes placed on cigarette and alcohol products, both creating a significant impact on healthcare costs. There are pending lawsuits against the tobacco industry for this reason).

If another industry markets products known to create health problems, why should Ontario’s taxpayers bear the financial burden placed on our healthcare system resulting from consumption of the products?

As a family doctor, I can assure you, nothing gives me greater satisfaction than having healthy patients. However, we all get sick from time to time and some of us develop chronic and at times, debilitating illnesses. Illness and disease are never ‘fair’. After all, who deserves to become ill? Taxing unhealthy products more heavily would drive their costs up and might drive consumers to more healthy choices.

 

Share

The high cost of orphan patients

orphan patientby Dr. Andrew Lam, Family Physician, Toronto

Some refer to patients with no family doctor as ‘orphan’ patients. Most of these patients have no centralized, coordinated care and deal with healthcare issues on an ad hoc basis. Ad hoc healthcare is not ideal by any stretch of the imagination. If a patient develops chronic illnesses (for example diabetes) the care can get more complicated especially if other health issues arise. It is not uncommon for many patients to be addressing multiple issues and the resulting necessary healthcare can become complex. When complex healthcare issues are not managed properly, it is easy to understand how they can become more expensive to the healthcare system and less than ideal for the patient. Continue reading

Share

Selling fear and crying the healthcare financial blues.

economic_outlookby Dr. Jan Lusis, Family Physician, Toronto

In a recent article in the Toronto Star (“Health budget math doesn’t add up”, January 19, 2012), Carol Goar tells an interesting story of the perpetually negative scenario politician and pundits paint concerning our healthcare system. The column is worth reading.


 

Continue reading

Share

With healthcare reform, could the needy be left behind?

needy_patientsby Dr. Claudette Chase, Family Physician, Thunder Bay

One of the cornerstones of our universal, publicly-funded healthcare system is the promise that everyone is entitled to the same level of quality healthcare, regardless of their socioeconomic status. We promise to care for the needy as well as we care for the affluent. Continue reading

Share

The business reality of healthcare

antique cell phoneBy Dr. James Stewart, Family Physician, North Bay

When many people think of healthcare in Ontario, they think of it as ‘free healthcare’. For some, the idea of anyone making a profit in healthcare is viewed as immoral, if not illegal. The truth is, there is profit all through the system, from for-profit suppliers of technology and equipment to professionals operating support services in the community. Continue reading

Share

The Value Equation in the Quality Agenda.

Aiming for qualityby Dr. James Stewart, Family Physician, North Bay

While it is good the government has a Quality Agenda to quantify and ensure quality healthcare for patients in Ontario, one could argue it is a sad statement that such a program is needed in the first place. Continue reading

Share

Healthcare 2012 and beyond

Healthcare 2012by Dr. Garrett Foley, Family Physician, Cornwall

Almost every forecaster you listen to or read does not have encouraging economic views of the year ahead of us. When you look at the rest of the world, Ontario has fared much better than most. Europe, the United States, Japan; almost everywhere you look there are significant economic problems. With funding for healthcare dependent upon tax revenues, it is obvious publicly-funded healthcare will face significant challenges. Although Ontario has been more resilient than most jurisdictions, we are beginning to face the same challenges others are facing around the world. Continue reading

Share

Could reduced healthcare spending mean more collaboration?

Collaborationby Dr. Jan Lusis, Family Physician, Toronto

Reading the news lately, many people think cuts to Ontario’s healthcare budget seem all but inevitable. However, they are not cuts per se; rather we will likely see the amount of increase in annual healthcare spending trimmed. Continue reading

Share

Living with Living Will legislation.

Living willby Dr. James Stewart, Family Physician, North Bay

Recently, Ontario’s former Health Minister, George Smitherman, posted a blog on Canadian Healthcare Manager suggesting Ontario’s healthcare system needed leadership rather than simply more money. I would go one step further and suggest what the system needs as much ‘leadership’ is visionaries. However, easier said than done. Continue reading

Share

Helping “Home First” Work

Healthcare at homeby Dr. Ross Male, Family Physician, Brampton.

If you are ill, where would you prefer to be? At home getting the care you need or in a hospital? Most people (including myself), would prefer to be in their own home, if proper care was managed. For too long, the default was hospitalization when in many cases, it could have been avoided. What was needed was a coordinated primary care strategy, overseen by your family doctor.

The Government of Ontario has a “Home First” strategy intended to keep those of us in need of care out of hospitals, if possible and provided proper care is not compromised. Continue reading

Share